Press 1 for environmental updates
Press 2 for steps on how to open the escape hatch
Press 3 for the sound of someone finally touching grass


While a fellow documentarian started an exciting new project in the Zomia region, I'm in the archives tracing the past. Who said historiography is dead?


"Drift" by Art Jeeno (aka Piyaphach Jeeno), 2025, oli on canvas, 100x100 cm


Someone kindly gave me a good luck charm... Looks like I'm all set for the year of the horse.


Took the ferry... and found my how-to guide.


Everything was going swimmingly… until the software status update said: Hold my tea.


Where the lake holds the sky in its stillness... Glad I didn't skip this plateau.


Wasn’t really sure what to expect but yeah the decor is truly one of a kind.


Moon cake at the halls of consumption


Preparing a seasonal roast


Clearly I don't get contemporary brand naming...

(Other brands are available)


And now, for you, Lyra's tune... courtesy of Wayward Jane.


View from the meeting room...

Kuala Lumpur is much greener than Krung Thep. Rush hour traffic is just as hectic, though...

Hopefully, this wraps up soon, or at least we can take the convo elsewhere.


Cautious commentators say AI might amplify existing societal biases. Yes, that might be true. But what about history-washing, or any other kind of "-washing" you care to name?

I'm interested in business history and have read a few Wikipedia articles. So I thought I would ask a commercial LLM for a quick overview of the history of a US company called IBM.

The app promptly gave me a neat, decade-by-decade summary. To my surprise, it looked odd; the "history" was entirely devoid of Edwin Black's findings on the strategic alliance of IBM's European subsidiaries with genocidal regimes in the 1930s.

All of this is well known and even IBM's Wikipedia article cites Black (2001) extensively. So why was none of this mentioned, and why did I get a selective highlight of IBM's involvement in the US government and military?

Beyond the technical challenges (or the enormous water and energy consumption), should the training and filtering mechanisms of LLMs not be open to scrutiny?



Let me pause here for a moment or two.


When someone in the audience hears "…Taylor's influence shaped modern ergonomics" and asks "Who? Taylor Swift?"