Review no. one encourages interdisciplinarity. Points to a monograph.
Holding my horses for what the other review has in store.
Doc Edward Morbius likes this.
⇧
Review no. one encourages interdisciplinarity. Points to a monograph.
Holding my horses for what the other review has in store.
Doc Edward Morbius likes this.
Doc Edward Morbius
in reply to Andy HΞ3 • • •The first few times through I parsed that as "Review: No one encourages interdisciplinary."
Finally got it.
Andy HΞ3 likes this.
Doc Edward Morbius
in reply to Andy HΞ3 • • •Andy HΞ3
in reply to Andy HΞ3 • •That's brilliant @Doc Edward Morbius
Of course, we'd normally say reviewer (no.) 1. I deliberately went with "review" to highlight the disembodied nature of the process. In blind peer review, the person giving feedback is mostly invisible.
I think there's some truth in your initial reading. Interdisciplinary research is often held up high, but it's quite risky and usually requires more effort.
Doc Edward Morbius likes this.