The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.
In retrospect, it's completely incredible that apparently not for a moment did the team behind the 1981 UK Computer Literacy Project consider a non-British-built computer as the project's flagship.
That's not a criticism; it's an acknowledgment of how vibrant the UK computer manufacture scene was at the time. The BBC asked seven different British computer manufacturers to make a pitch.
In the context of the current talk about data sovereignty and looming technofascism, the choice to wind down the British computer industry (in the name of efficiency?) seems shortsighted.
Alison Gazzard, "Now the Chips Are Down", MIT Press Platform Studies series, 2016.
reshared this
Paolo Amoroso
in reply to Amin Girasol • • •Amin Girasol
in reply to Paolo Amoroso • • •@amoroso yes! You sent me off to Wikipedia to find and share the page which is the list of European computer manufacturers - only to discover there's no such page!
Off the top of my head, 1950s to 1990s, European minis and mainframes:
1970s to 1990s European minicomputers:
Additions welcome! Please boost!
Thomas Fuchs
in reply to Amin Girasol • • •Mailüfterl - Wikipedia
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)Thomas Fuchs
in reply to Thomas Fuchs • • •Rasmus Grouleff (he/him)
in reply to Amin Girasol • • •@amoroso In Denmark: Regnecentralen.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regnecen…
Regnecentralen - Wikipedia
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)Tom Fakes (he/him)
in reply to Amin Girasol • • •Norsk Data - Wikipedia
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)gmc
in reply to Amin Girasol • • •gmc
in reply to gmc • • •Andreas Sikkema
in reply to gmc • • •Amin Girasol
in reply to Andreas Sikkema • • •gmc
in reply to Amin Girasol • • •gmc
in reply to Amin Girasol • • •Amin Girasol
in reply to Amin Girasol • • •Reading a bit more, I find this unsourced claim on Wikipedia:
Instructed by whom? The DTI? BBC management? The article is unclear on that.
If anyone has better information, let me know!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grundy_N…
Grundy NewBrain - Wikipedia
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)EdS
in reply to Amin Girasol • • •There's an oral history interview with Chris Curry, with a transcript, where you'll find mention of the Newbrain angle for the BBC Microcomputer.
stardot.org.uk/forums/viewtopi…
@fluidlogic
Interesting YouTube videos - Page 18
Zarchos (stardot.org.uk)Amin Girasol
in reply to EdS • • •@EdS oh great, thanks. The evidence is strong that the NewBrain was a contender for the BBC computer literacy project - that's not in question - what I'm interested to know more about was the degree to which the BBC team were 'coerced' or 'advised' to choose a British built computer. Alison Gazzard doesn't address that, which is a pity.
I know @floppydays recently did an exhaustive series of interviews with John Grant, Steve O’Hara-Smith and Gerald McMullon "...concerning their involvement with the NewBrain back in the day" and emulator author Chris Espoinidis.
floppydays.libsyn.com/size/10/…
I'm not aware that the definitive history of the Grundy NewBrain has been written.
(I've always had a soft spot for the Grundy NewBrain because even back when it was new, the machine's name sounded cartoonish, like something the Monty Python team would've dreamed up if they'd ever done a sketch about microcomputers. My apologies to any Grundy NewBrain fans I may have insulted.)
Floppy Days Vintage Computing Podcast
floppydays.libsyn.comEdS
in reply to Amin Girasol • • •Ah yes, sorry, I see you were asking about the process within the BBC.
Perhaps again peripheral to that, Richard Russell posted some recollections and scans of documents from a now-deleted account in a good thread on Stardot:
stardot.org.uk/forums/viewtopi…
> Forty years ago today, on 12th February 1981, Acorn was chosen to supply the BBC Microcomputer. By then the competition had been whittled down to Newbury, Tangerine and (late entrant) Commodore, with Nascom, Sinclair and Transam having been eliminated two weeks earlier. The rest is history...
Richard was a BBC employee, and involved heavily in the specification of BBC Basic. See his own history at
bbceng.info/Designs/designs_re…
@fluidlogic @floppydays
RTR's career in Designs Department
www.bbceng.infoEdS
in reply to EdS • • •The "Outline specification for the BBC MICROCOMPUTER system" can be found on this thread:
stardot.org.uk/forums/viewtopi…
@fluidlogic @floppydays
viewtopic.php
stardot.org.ukAmin Girasol
in reply to EdS • • •@EdS @floppydays ah yes, that document is referenced in Gazzard.
There's not a word in there indicating that foreign-owned manufacturers are disqualified, but then this is the brief that was sent to selected British manufacturers.
I'd love to know more about how the BBC team selected the shortlist.
EdS
in reply to Amin Girasol • • •An excellent document is the 78 page
The legacy of the BBC Micro
nesta.org.uk/report/the-legacy…
wherein we read about the process, albeit without specific citations:
> The BBC team approached seven companies (Acorn, Tangerine, Newbury, Research Machines, Sinclair, Transam, and Nascom) to submit bids to build the BBC Micro. These companies were specially selected because of fears that an open tender would have resulted in an overwhelming number of bids. It was felt that many of these would have been from British companies with ‘no reliable track-record’, or from Japanese and American companies who threatened to outcompete British firms. There was a definite emphasis on this being a British microcomputer, and the companies approached were already manufacturing or developing microcomputers at a similar specification and price to the one the BBC wanted.
@fluidlogic @floppydays
The legacy of BBC Micro
nestaAmin Girasol
in reply to EdS • • •@EdS @floppydays Aha! Commodore is specifically called out as a late entrant!
Thank you for these links. There's so much amazing history buried in forum posts, and who knows what we've lost to the heedless maw of Fecebook. The fragility of this information is a real concern. I think most enthusiast forums are one database server crash away from oblivion.
Amin Girasol
in reply to EdS • • •@EdS @floppydays notice the bitrot on Richard Russell's page. This snapshot includes the photo of the 1702A 256-byte EPROM, which is currently missing from Russell's page.
web.archive.org/web/2025051613…
RTR's career in Designs Department
web.archive.orggmc
in reply to Amin Girasol • • •Jamie
in reply to Amin Girasol • •Amin Girasol likes this.
Jamie
in reply to Amin Girasol • •Amin Girasol likes this.
Amin Girasol
in reply to Jamie • • •Martin Gleadow
in reply to Amin Girasol • • •Thatcherite de-industrialisation for a focus on "knowledge" and "service" industries was so short sighted and risky.
Why would any government willingly choose to be utterly dependent on the whims of another nation state?